Wednesday, 5 April 2017

Harry Potter web quest


Respected Sir,

1.   Feminist reading of Hermione’s character in Harry Potter:
 Harmione is quite simple, beautiful, intelligent and brave girl yet J.K Rowling has not given main role. Perhaps J. K. Rolling willingly not given main role to Hermione because may audience or especially male don’t prefer it or it wasn’t popular as it is. Harmione is innocent as she selected by Krum but she has not courage or choice to select by her will. Ron and Harry felt that if Hermione is not with them then they can’t sometimes come out of such situation but they don’t want to realize it to Hermione.She is normal and not as much arguing as Eve so audience or male like it. She is a giver like her perch. She wants Ron as her boyfriend but won’t tell him as other girls generally facing. When Ron wounded in chess at that time she take care as her wife or friend means she is ideal as Indian women. She needs protector as in the toilet, she screamed for help and boys help her. Even she has every quality still all likes Harry more than her. Means crave for boy child.

Other female characters support feminist discourse in Harry Potter?
 Professor McGonagall supporting three friends or child means a lady has to support. If we look at professor of Hogwarts than we can see male are more than female. I think there is not any bad role given to female character means they are good but not capable of high role. Why old man guiding Harry to kill Harry not old lady as in Kanthapura. Women are fearful as Harry’s maternal aunt. Harry’s mother is living Harry means mother should love and take care of child. Padma and Parvati are not beautiful so Ron and Harry dislike them means women should be beautiful. All female characters are good beautiful ported but yet it is anti-feminist because justice is not given to female.

2. What is speculative literature?
Speculative fiction is a broad umbrella category of narrative fiction which includes genres, alternative history, fancy, horror fiction, magic, realism, science fancy, science fiction, super natural elements, Any fiction in which the “law” is broken etc. Speculative fiction takes our existing world and changes it by asking “what if” what if monkey can fly? It is beyond the imagination of particular person or the world is totally different than ours. If we ask could this world really exist according to our current knowledge of reality? It the answer is yes it probably isn’t, if the answer is no it probably speculative. History is speculative in some way. (Annie Neugebauer)

How far Harry Potter qualifies for the same?
                                                                  Harry Potter is on magical word which is imaginative with complex background. We don’t move ahead to understand other things without clearing background. There is not specific reason for any character to enter in any situation. Harry is an ordinary man still he can overcome through evil. Several things are difficult to imagine or different image creates in individual’s mind.Harry Potter is a mythical character with mark “N”. It constantly showing so we can remain in frame that it gifted from birth. He is also signifying that only he is capable of killing Voldemort. We can compare Harry with Lord Krishna that both are rule broker still they are good.
Does J K Rowling transcends the confines of speculative literature and claim the heights of ‘real’ literature?
J. K. Rowling went beyond the speculative literature because she has also described human real relation like mud blood, pure blood and Muggle blood. These are real and every one can imagine same. Hierarchical structure and real school background is also there. So we not just remain for child but claimed real literature also.

3. Power and politics in Harry Potter-There is presence of power and politics in film. This movie based on ideal person that is Howard (School of magic). It is not like great magician alive but it depends on struggle and faces the problem. Hierarchical structure used as a fear mechanism in whole movie. Rather than equality, equity becomes more impotant.  I think in America there is not superiority in people but they have that kind of feelings for other as for black. Only power can’t work but there is the need of knowledge to sustain with power. Sometimes the time come power can’t work as Dumbledore die.

Self Evaluation:-
Overall Aesthetics:-
Overall visual appeal:-2 Points
Navigation & flow:-4 Points
Mechanical aspects:-2 Points
Introduction:-
Motivational effectiveness of introduction:-2 Points
Cognitive effectiveness of the introduction:-1 Point
Task:-
Connection of task to standards:-2 Points
Cognitive level of the task:-3 Points
Process:-
Clarity of process:-3 Points
Scaffolding of process:-3 Points
Richness of process:-2 Points
Resources:-
Relevance & quality of resources:-3 Points
Quality of resources:-2 Points
Evaluation:-
Clarity of evaluation criteria:-3Points
Total:-32/50

Paper 15 Mass Media and Communication

Name: Vyas Nupur Hitesh Bhai.
Roll No: 34, M.A English
SEM: 4
Paper 15 Mass Media and Communication
Topic: What are the Needs for communication?
Batch- 2015-17
Submitted to S.B. Gardi Department of English, MKBU [Bhavnagar}








Communication meaning:
A human relationship involving two or more persons who come together to share, to dialogue and to commune. Thus, communication is not just an act or a process but also a social and cultural togetherness. According to Denis Mcquail, “Communication is a process which increases commonality – but also requires elements of commonality for it to occur at all.” A common language for instance does bring people together but language alone does not suffice for communication to take place. There are other factors too at play such as a shared culture and a common interest which bring about a sense of commonality and more significantly, a sense of community. The Sanskrit term, ‘Sadharanikaran’ comes closest to the term of ‘common’ or ‘commonness’ usually associated with communication.
Needs for Communication
A human being’s need for communication is as strong as the need to eat, sleep and love. Communication is as much a natural need as it is a social requirement in order to engage in the sharing of experiences, through symbol mediated interaction. It requires active interaction with our physical, biological and social environments. The basic human need for communication can perhaps be traced to the process of mankind’s evolution from lower species. Excommunication or lack of communication may lead to sensory deprivation, anxiety, depraved judgement, strange visions. Communication represents an essential and very important human need as well as a basic human right. Without having the possibility to communicate and talk to other people, no individual, community, group or any other institution would be able to exist, or prosper. Strictly speaking the ability to communicate or the general right of communication make it possible to exchange opinions, thoughts and meanings. So it enables people to express themselves and show their own points of view. Consequently communication makes people who and what they are and particularly strengthens human dignity. By having the right to communicate and express personal thoughts, ideas, and opinions, people feel themselves treated equally – in other words: Communication validates human equality. Thus the protection and implementation of communication rights represents an essential part of the general topic of human rights. Strictly speaking there exist four central Pillars of Communication Rights.  Each Pillar refers to a different domain of social existence, practice, and experience, in which communication generally represents a so-called core activity on the one hand and performs specific key functions on the other hand. The most important point considering the four pillars consists in the fact that each involves a relatively autonomous sphere of social action. So they are extremely necessary in order to achieve communication rights – a fact that means that everybody has the right to communicate about every single topic.
The Four Pillars of Communication Rights are the following ones:
Communicating on the Public Sphere: The role of communication and media in exercising democratic political participation in society.
     Communication Knowledge: The terms and means by which           knowledge generated by society is communicated, or blocked, for use by different groups.
       Civil Rights in Communication: The exercise of civil rights relating to the processes of communication in society.
Cultural Rights in Communication: The communication of diverse cultures, cultural forms and identities at the individual and social levels.
                                                                                The Four Pillars of Communication Rights point out very clearly why the right to communicate is important for people in order to live in freedom, peace, justice, and dignity. So the right to communicate can be seen as a means to enhance human rights as well as to carefully strengthen the social, cultural and economic lives of people of different nations, communities, institutions and groups. It is very important to know that the ‘right to communicate’ does not have the equal meaning of ‘communication right’. In spite of all the two terms are closely related in both their history and usage. Strictly speaking the ‘right to communicate’ is generally associated with the New World Information and Communication Order (NWICO) debate and expresses the need for a legal acknowledgement as a framework for a better implementation. The other term, ‘communication right’, points out that a group of international rights fortifying communication already exists, but in spite of everything many are too often ignored.

Communication is a process of sending and receiving information among people. Humans communicate with others not only by face-to-face communication, but also by giving information via the Internet and printed products such as books and newspapers. Many people believe that the significance of communication is like the importance of breathing. Indeed, communication facilitates the spread of knowledge and forms relationships between people.
First of all, communication helps to spread knowledge and information among people. For example, authors write books to impart knowledge to the World, and teachers share their experience with their students. Also, friends or co-workers discuss their ideas with each other, and companies exchange information with their subsidiaries and customers. Besides, the advent of the Internet not only allows people to have better access to knowledge and information in all fields, but also makes it easier and faster to contact with people around the World. Undoubtedly, the sharing knowledge and information process cannot function without communication. As a result, companies cannot operate, and humanity will be drowned in the abyss of ignorance. Communication helps to spread knowledge and information among people. Moreover, communication is the foundation of all human relationship. At first, strangers start talking and getting to know each other, and then the relationships are formed when they have more interaction and communication. Communicating helps people to express their ideas and feelings, and it, at the same time, helps us to understand emotion and thoughts of the others. As a result, we will develop affection or hatred toward other people, and positive or negative relationships will be created. It is no doubt that communication plays a vital role in human life. It not only helps to facilitate the process of sharing information and knowledge, but also helps people to develop relationships with others. Therefore, the importance of communication cannot be underestimated. Every day, we communicate with a lot of people including our families, our friends, our colleagues, or even strangers. We should learn how to communicate effectively to make our lives better.  Mass media and other forms of communication technology have an enormous influence in helping to shape public opinion and underlying sentiment. Newspapers, TV and radio are all important sources of basic information about other people and other places and this can itself help to engender understanding if presented in a fair, even-handed and non-inflammatory way.  The media is also an important accountability mechanism: it raises important issues, corruption for example, that might otherwise never be publicly debated or addressed. The media also has an important role in stimulating governments to take action on social policy: although stories about migrants or refugees might reinforce prejudice in some quarters, they also expose problems that need to be addressed, for example poor living conditions or lack of access to services, the citizenship status of migrants, the response of local communities to their settlement and so on.  But the media can also, in some cases, become an instrument for the dissemination of false and inflammatory messages and values that do not promote respect or well-tempered dialogue and discussion. Negative messages can divide communities and can help perpetuate the stereotypes that nurture violence. The internet has radically changed the way in which people communicate and connect with each other. As a means of social interaction, the web brings people together – friends, family, young people, or complete strangers that share interests or objectives – and this can foster a sense of belonging and identity. The web, however, has also been used to target people, mainly young users, to radicalize them into specific belief systems and divisive ways of seeing the world.
                                    Other media initiatives have been successful at increasing the inclusion of previously marginalized groups by providing them with a means of expressing their views. Positive results have also resulted from the creation of channels through which older, familiar binary disputes can be broken down and re-imagined in ways that highlight common interests that transcend warring boundaries.
Mass communication becomes very important while communicating ideas intended to change behaviour of people right from developing awareness to adoption of an innovation. When people are exposed to an increasing flow of information, they find themselves in a position which necessitates a change in their aspiration, attitude and effort.
Frequent exposure to mass media can create the urge for a higher standard of living. There is adequate research evidence throwing light upon the potentialities of individual medium of mass communication as well as a total effect of mass media exposure in changing cognitive and affective behaviour of rural people.
Radio and Television have invaded almost every corner of the country. People sit glued to watch television. Research has also proved the effectiveness of these media in educating people. Hence mass communication is one of the important inputs for the development of the nation.
Radio, television, newspaper, movies are used widely as means of mass communication for information and entertainment.
Today, mass communication brings people closer by developing common understanding of the event or issue. We are dependent on mass communication not only for information, entertainment and politics but also education, science, religion, charities, agriculture and transportation.
In one way or another, almost every major social activity in modern life depends on the use of mass communication media to greater or lesser extent.
Mass communication is important for socialization of people because changes in subtle areas such as the socialization of the individual in regard to knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs, can be brought about through mass communication by using media like television and cinema.
Thus, mass communication plays an important role in the transmission of attitudes, perceptions and beliefs. Mass media like television and radio are influential force when the same ideas, people, or behaviors, occur consistently from program to program and presented in a stereotype manner.
Mass communication has developed into industry and has provided jobs to millions of people enabling them to earn their living.
Work sited





























Monday, 3 April 2017

Paper 13 The New LIterature




Name: Vyas Nupur Hiteshbhai
Roll No: 34
M.A English, Batch: 2015-17
SEM – 4
Paper 13 The New literature
Topic:  The Difference between Wizards and Muggles.
Submitted to Department of English, MKBU[Bhavnagar].

Introduction of Writer:
 J.K.Rowling (born 31 July 1965), pen name Robert Galbraith, is a British novelist, screenwriter and film producer best known as the author of the Harry Potter fantasy series. The books have gained worldwide attention, won multiple awards, and sold more than 400 million copies. They have become the best-selling book series in history and been the basis for a series of films over which Rowling had overall approval on the scripts] and maintained creative control by serving as a producer on the final instalment.



The Difference between Wizards and Muggles.


"You place too much importance, and you always have done, on the so-called purity of blood! You fail to recognize that it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be!"
—Albus Dumbledore's stance on blood status
Blood status also called purity of blood is a concept in the wizarding world that distinguishes between family trees that have different levels of magically-endowed members. It often results in prejudice towards those who have a large number of Muggles in their families. Wizarding society in general considers itself apart from and superior to Muggle society, which is not connected with magic. As Sirius Black informed Harry Potter, almost all wizards of their time have Muggles in their family trees, though some claim not to. The concept played a key role in both the First and Second Wizarding Wars. In truth, pure-blood families have ceased to exist during the 1900s.
A Muggle, is a British-English Wizarding cultural term describing a person who is born to two non-magical parents and is incapable of performing magic. Although, most muggles are the offspring of two muggles, the offspring of two squibs or of a squib and a muggle would be, by definition, a muggle. Muggles are not to be confused with Squibs, who also lack magic but are born to at least one magical parent.
Most Muggles are not aware that magic exists at all and that those with it have organized their own society largely separate from the Muggle world. The few Muggles that do know of the existence of the wizarding world are usually parents, or close relatives, of witches and wizards (for example, Hermione Granger's parents, Mr. and Mrs. Granger, knew of the wizarding world because of their daughter, as did Harry Potter's aunt and uncle). The term "Muggle" is widely used in the wizarding world, and, while it could be considered derogatory, generally is not intended to be offensive; in fact, it is often used affectionately, often by Arthur Weasley, who has a great fondness for Muggles and learning about them and their way of life. Some of the more prejudiced members of the community, however, use the word in the same context as the epithet "Mud blood," though the term is generally associated with Muggle-borns (witches or wizards that come from non-magic families/Muggles). These wizards or witches believe that Muggle-borns have "stolen" magic and thus are actually Muggles, rather than legitimate wizards or witches.
Since the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy was enacted in 1692, wizards and witches have hidden the existence of magic from Muggles. Thus, most Muggles are either afraid of magic or believe it to be nothing but a childish fantasy. Wizards and witches hide their world with Muggle-Repelling Charms, and if a Muggle witnesses a magical event or sees a magical creature such as a dragon, their memories are erased. Confundus Charms are also occasionally employed to encourage Muggles to ignore any magic they witness. Violations of the Statute of Secrecy are prosecuted by the Improper Use of Magic Office, and the Misuse of Muggle Artefacts Office tries to keep bewitched items away from Muggles.
Wizards and witches thus organized their own society, known as the wizarding world, distinct from that of Muggles. There are some exclusively magical settlements, such as Hogsmeade, but also magical communities hidden within largely Muggle ones, such as in Ottery St Catchpole and even in London. Magical people also have a separate currency system and government. The Ministry of Magic maintains relations with the Muggle Prime Minister, but they do not appear to be subordinate to the Muggle government.
‘’Most wizards these days are half-blood anyway. If we hadn't married Muggles we'd've died out."
—Ron Weasley discussing blood purity.

Muggle Mrs. Cole and wizard Albus Dumbledore talking about Tom Riddle.
However, the Muggle and magical worlds are tied together in some ways. For instance, Muggles sometimes marry wizards or witches and thus become aware of the wizarding world, as occurred with Mr. Finnigan when he married a witch. Muggles also occasionally produce a magical child. In Britain, these Muggle-born wizards and witches will often join the wizarding world when they are invited to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Their parents will thus be informed of the existence of the wizarding world, and may even enter it on occasion, as Hermione Granger's parents did when they accompanied their daughter and the Weasley family to Diagon Alley to shop for school supplies in 1992.
Some Muggles are aware of the magical world but, through choice, choose to ignore it, such as Vernon Dursley, who was aware his sister-in-law was a witch but otherwise remained intentionally ignorant of the wizarding world until he was forced to recognize it with the arrival of his nephew, Harry Potter.
In addition, there are secret connections maintained between the two societies at the governmental level; for example, the Minister for Magic occasionally consults with the Prime Minister of Great Britain on issues affecting both societies, and it is clear that the Prime Minister is aware of the wizarding world. Each Prime Minister, on the day appointed to office, gets a visit from the current Minister for Magic. The visit encompasses telling the Prime Minister of the existence of magic and that they will only ever need to meet when there is something going on in the wizarding world that might affect the Muggle world.



"Wizards represent all that the true 'Muggle' most fears: They are plainly outcasts and comfortable with being so. Nothing is more unnerving to the truly conventional than the unashamed misfit!"
J. K. Rowling regarding how Muggles view wizards.

The Muggle Dursley family, who despised magic.
Historically, Muggles tended to consider those who practiced magic to be evil, leading to the burning of witches during the middle Ages. In response, some wizards and witches managed to use Flame-Freezing Charms to render the fire harmless. Thus, most considered the Muggle efforts completely useless. However, such acts were part of the reason that wizards decided to go into hiding. Many wizards were killed by these incidents. Some innocent Muggles were being burned as witches, magical children born to Muggles were often persecuted when their magical abilities surfaced, and some Muggles tried to make magical people perform magic for their own ends. Magical creatures left the Muggles too, as many of them were extinguished, probably because of overhunting and ecosystem destruction.



Muggle dentists Mr. and Mrs. Granger, who were accepting of magic
In the modern world, few Muggles believe in magic. Some who are aware of the wizarding world are accepting of it, such as Hermione Granger's parents and Jacob Kowalski. Others, however, respond negatively. The Dursley family, for instance, had a "very medieval" attitude towards magic. Petunia Dursley considered her sister Lily Potter a "freak" for her abilities, although this was originally prompted by envy of them, so she would not have thought of her sister like this if she too had had those powers. She, her husband, and son, Dudley were suspicious of magic, and thus treated their wizard nephew Harry Potter badly and distrusted anyone associated with magic. They also tried to prevent him from learning of his magical heritage, without success. Ariana Dumbledore was attacked and severely traumatized by Muggle boys after they saw her use magic and she was unable to show them how to do it. So this was not as much an act of prejudice than an act of envy, like Petunia. Tom Marvolo Riddle also once suggested that his Muggle father abandoned Merope Gaunt, his pregnant wife because he discovered that she was a witch.
It has been suggested by some wizards and witches that Muggles choose, on some level, not to believe in magic, since there are inevitably some occasions at which they are exposed to magic but seem to ignore it or attribute it to other causes.

Wizarding attitude towards Muggles
"Alecto... teaches Muggle Studies, which is compulsory for everyone. We've all got to listen to her explain how Muggles are like animals, stupid and dirty, and how they drive wizards into hiding by being vicious toward them, and how the natural order is being re-established."
—Neville Longbottom on Death Eaters' teaching while Lord Voldemort was in power.
Many magical people, particularly pure-bloods, consider their own world superior to that of Muggles. Some consider Muggles little better than animals and hate them. For example, Araminta Meliflua once proposed that the Ministry of Magic make Muggle hunting legal.

The Magic is Might statue that depict Muggles in their 'rightful' place.
Dark Wizard Gellert Grindelwald originally intended to conquer the world and make Muggles subservient to wizards. Lord Voldemort and his Death Eaters killed Muggles for amusement during the First and Second Wizarding Wars. They often extend this hatred to Muggle-borns as well, considering them to be unworthy of magic and not "real" wizards or witches. During the Second Wizarding War, Muggle-borns were rounded up by the Ministry of Magic (on Voldemort's orders) and accused of stealing magic from wizards; a way of thoroughly humiliating them instead of killing them outright. In 1997 during the height of the Second Wizarding War a statue was created that illustrated Muggles in their "rightful place", crushed by the might that is magic. This statue resided in the Ministry atrium and acted as a symbol of Lord Voldemort's new regime.
Others, however have more favorable opinions. The Ministry also tries to protect Muggles from the Dark Arts and other potentially harmful magic things with its Misuse of Muggle Artifacts Office. Muggle Studies is also an optional subject at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry that strives to educate magical children about the Muggle world and to foster understanding of it. One witch, Carlotta Pinkstone, famously advocated for the repeal of the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy. She believed in the idea that Muggles should know about magic, and performed magic publicly on several occasions.

Harry Potter surrounded by Arthur Weasley's collection of muggle objects.
Arthur Wesley is very interested in how Muggles function without the aid of magic, and collects Muggle items, though he often gets their names and other facts wrong. He has a large collection of batteries and electric plugs. He was ecstatic to meet Hermione Granger's Muggle parents, inviting them to have a drink with him at the Leaky Cauldron. During Harry Potter's stays at the Burrow, Arthur often sat next to Harry to ask him questions about Muggles. He was also interested to learn how the Muggle post office and telephone work, and his greatest ambition was to learn how aeroplanes stay up.
Some Muggle pastimes have also found favour with those in the wizarding world. Famously, Albus Dumbledore's Chocolate Frog Card proclaims his liking of the Muggle sport of ten-pin bowling, and he also developed a fondness for a Muggle sweet called sherbet lemon. Some elements of Muggle pop culture have also bled over into wizarding culture, such as rock and roll music which is performed by groups such as the Weird Sisters. The concept of "tabloid journalism" is also alive in the wizarding world.
Such wizards and witches are considered "blood traitors" by prejudiced pure-bloods such as the Malfoy and Black families for their belief in Muggle equality and attempts to protect them. Brutus Malfoy once claimed that it was a sign of weak magic to enjoy the company of Muggles, and his descendant Lucius Malfoy tried to sabotage Arthur Weasley's career after he proposed the Muggle Protection Act in 1992.

Work Sited:


The Theme of Racial discrimination in ‘’Things Fall Apart’’.

Name: Vyas Nupur Hiteshbhai
Roll No: 34
M.A English , Batch: 2015-17
Sem - 4
Paper 14 – The African Literature
Topic: The Theme of Racial discrimination in ‘’Things Fall Apart’’.
Submitted to S.B. Gardi Department Of English, MKBU [Bhavnagar].





About Writer:
Chinua Achebe is considered by many critics and teachers to be the most influential African writer of his generation. His writings, including the novel Things Fall Apart, have introduced readers throughout the world to creative uses of language and form, as well as to factual inside accounts of modern African life and history. Not only through his literary contributions but also through his championing of bold objectives for Nigeria and Africa, Achebe has helped reshape the perception of African history, culture, and place in world affairs. He first novel of Achebe's, Things Fall Apart, is recognized as a literary classic and is taught and read everywhere in the English-speaking world. The novel has been translated into at least forty-five languages and has sold several million copies. A year after publication, the book won the Margaret Wong Memorial Prize, a major literary award.


Racism means:
Racism is the belief in which certain groups of people are considered superior (or inferior) because of their skin color. One example of racism is the Ibo peoples' stories of the British men. These stories mock the white skin the English men have - the Ibo villagers call them lepers and albinos. (Achebe, 138-139 and 74) In this example the Ibo people believe they are superior. In other cases, it was the English who thought they were superior and thought of the Ibo people as uncivilized, using words like "primitive" when describing them. (Achebe 209) Exploitation of a group of people is a main part in the process of colonization.





Introduction
Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart is probably the most authentic narrative ever written about life in Nigeria at the turn of the twentieth century. Although the novel was first published in 1958 — two years before Nigeria achieved its independence — thousands of copies are still sold every year in the United States alone. Millions of copies have been sold around the world in its many translations. The novel has been adapted for productions on the stage, on the radio, and on television.
The novel takes its title from a verse in the poem "The Second Coming" by W. B. Yeats, an Irish poet, essayist, and dramatist:
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.
In this poem — ironically, a product of European thought — Yeats describes an apocalyptic vision in which the world collapses into anarchy because of an internal flaw in humanity. In Things Fall Apart, Achebe illustrates this vision by showing us what happened in the Igbo society of Nigeria at the time of its colonization by the British. Because of internal weaknesses within the native structure and the divided nature of Igbo society, the community of Umuofia in this novel is unable to withstand the tidal wave of foreign religion, commerce, technology, and government. In "The Second Coming," Yeats evokes the anti-Christ leading an anarchic world to destruction. This ominous tone gradually emerges in Things Fall Apart as an intrusive religious presence and an insensitive government together cause the traditional Umuofian world to fall apart.
When Things Fall Apart was first published, Achebe announced that one of his purposes was to present a complex, dynamic society to a Western audience who perceived African society as primitive, simple, and backward. Unless Africans could tell their side of their story, Achebe believed that the African experience would forever be "mistold," even by such well-meaning authors as Joyce Cary in Mister Johnson. Cary worked in Nigeria as a colonial administrator and was sympathetic to the Nigerian people. Yet Achebe feels that Cary, along with other Western writers such as Joseph Conrad, misunderstood Africa. Many European writers have presented the continent as a dark place inhabited by people with impenetrable, primitive minds; Achebe considers this reductionist portrayal of Africa racist. He points to Conrad, who wrote against imperialism but reduced Africans to mysterious, animalistic, and exotic "others." In an interview published in 1994, Achebe explains that his anger about the inaccurate portrayal of African culture by white colonial writers does not imply that students should not read works by Conrad or Cary. On the contrary, Achebe urges students to read such works in order to better understand the racism of the colonial era.
Achebe also kept in mind his own Nigerian people as an audience. In 1964, he stated his goal:
To help my society regain belief in itself and put away the complexes of the years of denigration and self-abasement. . . . I would be quite satisfied if my novels . . . did no more than teach my [African] readers that their past — with all its imperfections — was not one long night of savagery from which the first Europeans acting on God's behalf delivered them.
In Things Fall Apart, the Europeans' understanding of Africa is particularly exemplified in two characters: the Reverend James Smith and the unnamed District Commissioner. Mr. Smith sees no need to compromise on unquestionable religious doctrine or practices, even during their introduction to a society very different from his own. He simply does not recognize any benefit for allowing the Nigerians to retain elements of their heritage. The District Commissioner, on the other hand, prides himself on being a student of primitive customs and sees himself as a benevolent leader who has only the best intentions for pacifying the primitive tribes and bringing them into the modern era. Both men would express surprise if anyone suggested to them that their European values may not be entirely appropriate for these societies. The Commissioner's plan for briefly treating the story of Okonkwo illustrates the inclination toward Western simplification and essentialization of African culture.
To counter this inclination, Achebe brings to life an African culture with a religion, a government, a system of money, and an artistic tradition, as well as a judicial system. While technologically unsophisticated, the Igbo culture is revealed to the reader as remarkably complex. Furthermore, Things Fall Apart ironically reverses the style of novels by such writers as Conrad and Cary, who created flat and stereotypical African characters. Instead, Achebe stereotypes the white colonialists as rigid, most with imperialistic intentions, whereas the Igbos are highly individual, many of them open to new ideas.
But readers should note that Achebe is not presenting Igbo culture as faultless and idyllic. Indeed, Achebe would contest such a romantic portrayal of his native people. In fact, many Western writers who wrote about colonialism (including Joseph Conrad, George Orwell, Herman Melville, and Graham Greene) were opposed to imperialism but were romantic in their portrayal of noble savages — primitive and animalistic, yet uncorrupted and innocent. The opposition to imperialism that such authors voiced often rested on the notion that an advanced Western society corrupts and destroys the non-Western world. Achebe regards this notion as an unacceptable argument as well as a myth. The Igbos were not noble savages, and although the Igbo world was eventually destroyed, the indigenous culture was never an idyllic haven, even before the arrival of the white colonialists. In Things Fall Apart, Achebe depicts negative as well as positive elements of Igbo culture, and he is sometimes as critical of his own people as he is of the colonizers.
Achebe has been a major force in the worldwide literary movement to define and describe this African experience. Other postcolonial writers in this movement include Leopold Senghor, Wole Soyinka, Aime Cesaire, Derek Walcott, Ngugi wa Thiong'o, and Birago Diop. These writers not only confront a multi ethnic perspective of history and truth, but they also challenge readers to reexamine themselves in this complex and evolving world.
As an African novel written in English and departing significantly from more familiar colonial writing, Things Fall Apart was a ground breaking work. Achebe's role in making modern African literature a part of world literature cannot be understated.
 Throughout this novel, Achebe uses the spelling Ibo, the old spelling of the Umuofian community.
A Brief History of Nigeria
The history of Nigeria is bound up with its geography. About one-third larger than the state of Texas, Nigeria is located above the inner curve of the elbow on the west coast of Africa, just north of the equator and south of the Sahara Desert. More than two hundred ethnic groups — each with its own language, beliefs, and culture — live in present-day Nigeria. The largest ethnic groups are the mostly Protestant Yoruba in the west, the Catholic Igbo in the east, and the predominantly Muslim Hausa-Fulani in the north. This diversity of peoples is the result of thousands of years of history; as traders, nomads, and refugees from invaders and climatic changes came to settle with the indigenous population, and as foreign nations became aware of the area's resources.
The events in Things Fall Apart take place at the end of the nineteenth century and in the early part of the twentieth century. Although the British did not occupy most of Nigeria until 1904, they had a strong presence in West Africa since the early nineteenth century. The British were a major buyer of African slaves in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
In 1807, however, the British outlawed slave trade within their empire. At the time, they did not yet control Nigeria, and internal wars continually increased the available supply of captured slaves. In 1861, frustrated with the expanding slave trade, the British decided to occupy Lagos, a major slave-trading post and the capital of present-day Nigeria. Slowly and hesitantly, the British occupied the rest of Nigeria.
Ultimately, the British were prompted to occupy Nigeria for more than the slave trade. The British were in competition with other Europeans for control of the natural wealth of West Africa. At the Berlin Conference of 1884-85 — a meeting arranged to settle rivalries among European powers — the British proclaimed Nigeria to be their territory. They bought palm oil, peanuts, rubber, cotton, and other agricultural products from the Nigerians. Indeed, trade in these products made some Nigerian traders very wealthy. In the early twentieth century, the British defined the collection of diverse ethnic groups as one country, Nigeria, and declared it a colony of the British Empire.
The British moved into Nigeria with a combination of government control, religious mission, and economic incentive. In the north, the British ruled indirectly, with the support of the local Muslim leaders, who collected taxes and administered a government on behalf of the British. In the south, however, where communities (such as Umuofia in Things Fall Apart) were often not under one central authority, the British had to intervene directly and forcefully to control the local population.
For example, a real-life tragedy at the community of Ahiara serves as the historical model for the massacre of the village of Abame in Chapter 15 of Things Fall Apart. On November 16, 1905, a white man rode his bicycle into Ahiara and was killed by the natives. A month later, an expedition of British forces searched the villages in the area and killed many natives in reprisal.
The Ahiara incident led to the Bende-Onitsha Hinterland Expedition, a force created to eliminate Igbo opposition. The British destroyed the powerful Awka Oracle and killed all opposing Igbo groups. In 1912, the British instituted the Collective Punishment Ordinance, which stipulated punishment against an entire village or community for crimes committed by one or more persons against the white colonialists.
The British operated an efficient administrative system and introduced a form of British culture to Nigeria. They also sent many capable young Nigerians to England for education. The experience of Nigerians who lived overseas in the years preceding, during, and after World War II gave rise to a class of young, educated nationalists who agitated for independence from Great Britain. The British agreed to the Nigerians' demands and, in 1947, instituted a ten-year economic plan toward independence. Nigeria became an independent country on October 1, 1960, and became a republic in 1963.
With the British long gone from Nigeria, corruption and a lack of leadership continued to hamper Nigeria's quest for true democracy. A series of military coups and dictatorships in the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s replaced the fragile democracy that Nigeria enjoyed in the early 1960s. In 1993, Nigeria held a democratic presidential election, which was followed by yet another bloodless coup. And so continues the political pattern for the troubled, violent, most populous country in Africa.
The first example is of Mr. Brown who shows how "othering" contributes to colonization. Mr. Brown, an English Christian preacher, has a paternalistic view of the Ibo people and feels he was sent there by God to help them. He dismissed the Ibo people’s foolish beliefs in many gods, and told them his God is the only God. "There are no other gods,' said Mr. Brown. 'Chukwu is the only God and all others are false'' (Achebe 179). Mr. Brown uses Christianity to establish claims of superiority through medicine and education. Though racism is not obvious in his words, he still demonstrates racism because he is telling the Ibo people the white man's way is superior.
Reverend James Smith took the place of Mr. Brown (after Mr. Brown left Africa for health reasons). Even though Reverend Smith also wanted to convert the Ibo people to Christianity, he did it differently than Mr. Brown.
He condemned openly Mr. Brown's policy of compromise and accommodation. He saw things as black and white. And black was evil.
Reverend Smith clearly implies white is good and obviously superior, however he tries a kinder approach in persuading the Ibo people to worship the correct God unlike Mr. Brown. The fact that he saw the world as black and white, and black being evil shows how deeply rooted racism is when it comes to colonization. Not only were the English men's opinions racist, but also they used religious metaphors that were embedded with racism. "He saw the world as a battlefield in which the children of light were locked in moral conflict with the sons of darkness". The children of light represent white skinned children (because light is often thought of as the color white) and the sons of darkness represent black skinned boys (because darkness is often thought of as the color black). This is a clear representation of the racism impressed on the Ibo people during colonization.
The third example is the District Commissioner. The District commissioner is an English man who is a low-level government administrator. The District Commissioner is also an amateur anthropologist; his contribution to "othering" is that how he saw the Ibo people as objects of study. "Colonial governments discriminated against the employment of Africans in senior categories; and, whenever it happened that a white and black filled the same post, the white man was sure to be paid considerably more. This was true at all levels, ranging from civil service posts to mine workers. He fancied himself an expert on the Ibo people's customs and intended to write a book on them.
As he walked back to the court he thought about that book. Everyday brought him some new material. The story of this man who had killed a messenger and hanged himself would make interesting reading. One could almost write a whole chapter on him. Perhaps not a whole chapter but a reasonable paragraph, at any rate.
The fact that The District commissioner said he could almost write a chapter, or at least a paragraph, on Okonkwo's life is very belittling. It also shows how little he values the lives of any non-white people, like the Ibo. This is evidence of "othering" as well as implied racism. Another example of the District Commissioner's "othering" is the title he decided to give his book about the Ibo people: 'The Pacification of the Primitive Tribes of the Lower Niger' (Achebe 209). The key word is "primitive". He obviously considers the Ibo people to be uncivilized which, again, connects to racism because anything other than the color white (for skin) is evil and primitive.
In order to colonize, a group of people must have more advantages than those they are colonizing. Jared Diamond, a scholar, spent years studying colonization and ended up publishing a book on it titled "Guns, Germs, and Steel" which was later made into a series of films. Diamond has spent his life developing his theory for how people have been able to colonize throughout the years and have advantages over those whom they are colonizing. He believes that it is all about geography. It all depends on where an individual lives, what materials are accessible in that region, and the potential for building immunity to disease. In England there is a colder climate, which required more tools to create shelter and defense. Also, because of the cold climate, crops grown would die sooner, meaning the English had to rely on hunting and fishing for food. This led to the domestication of animals. By living in closer proximity to animals, this increased their chances for immunity to disease. In Nigeria, Africa there is almost a year round warm climate, which made it easier for the Ibo to obtain food for themselves (this mainly consisted of yams) and gave them more time to spend on building shelters. Also tools were created mainly for crops rather than hunting wild game. Weaponry was also not needed much because of a feeling of safety among the villagers. Based on Jared Diamond's theory, the difference between the Ibo people and English men is all about geography, not skin color.
The examples using three characters of: Mr. Brown, Reverend James Smith, and The District Commissioner are evidence of racism in Achebe's description of colonization. As Diamond's theory shows, there is no reason for one race to be considered superior to another. Exploitation of a group of people is a main part of the process of colonization. This is unethical behavior. Trade is a respectable and ethical way for two cultures to come together and exchange goods and raw materials. The title of Achebe's novel, Things Fall Apart, illustrates the harm caused by colonization and racism.
Work sited



How literature shape me?

How literature shape me?
During the five years of the journey of English literature especially in M.A English I learnt many things from literature. The first thing is literature teaches me life learning lessons through the different texts. Literature is not about the story or themes, symbols, narrative structures, but it is how difficult situation came and how we can react it or what we learn from situation and how literature help me to find way out from the situation. Literature’s most important function is when time comes, literature is really helpful to us or not? When time comes and literature do not help us then it is merely studying and remembering and get good marks in exams. But actual learning is not happen during difficult time.
                                       Literature taught me whatever knowledge given to us we have to ask questions? Whatever is told to us we can’t rely on that. We have to cultivate habit of fact-checks.

To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf

‘’One that needs, above all, courage, truth, and the power to endure’’ quote from To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf




Literature taught me from above quotes from literary texts. Literature helps me shaping my ideas about life, language, positive attitude towards life. Literature always inspires me. Literature gives wider sense of politics being played in the society. How language is used to manipulate things and overpower us by any form. Literature gives me broader sense of world. Literature helps me to widen horizon of my thought. Literature gives the historical sense of past as well as contemporary time. Literature taught me universality of text and text have to pass test of time.